<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ultimate Weblogging system, outlined</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ocaoimh.ie/the-ultimate-weblogging-system-outlined/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/the-ultimate-weblogging-system-outlined/</link>
	<description>Look what I found today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:05:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donncha</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/the-ultimate-weblogging-system-outlined/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2003 09:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Saying &quot;it&#039;s practically impossible&quot; in my post may have been a bit strong. It obviously is possible to use files instead of an RDBMS, as you show above.&lt;br /&gt;
The Unix philosophy of &quot;everything is a file&quot; comes to mind as I write this, although I&#039;m a bit hungover after a night out last night so I can&#039;t think of a decent connection, or expand on the idea!&lt;br /&gt;
I guess it&#039;s what level of abstraction you&#039;re used to. I&#039;m used to using SQL to interact with my data, but I still use files extensively to cache as much as I can. Database accesses are so very expensive when compared to the time required to serve a flat file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying &#8220;it&#8217;s practically impossible&#8221; in my post may have been a bit strong. It obviously is possible to use files instead of an RDBMS, as you show above.<br />
The Unix philosophy of &#8220;everything is a file&#8221; comes to mind as I write this, although I&#8217;m a bit hungover after a night out last night so I can&#8217;t think of a decent connection, or expand on the idea!<br />
I guess it&#8217;s what level of abstraction you&#8217;re used to. I&#8217;m used to using SQL to interact with my data, but I still use files extensively to cache as much as I can. Database accesses are so very expensive when compared to the time required to serve a flat file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Ruby</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/the-ultimate-weblogging-system-outlined/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Ruby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2003 01:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=#comment-57</guid>
		<description>The &#039;database&#039; for my weblog is a set of files in a directory.  The format is the same as blosxom&#039;s:

http://www.raelity.org/apps/blosxom/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;database&#8217; for my weblog is a set of files in a directory.  The format is the same as blosxom&#8217;s:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.raelity.org/apps/blosxom/" rel="nofollow">http://www.raelity.org/apps/blosxom/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
