Ryanair’s advertising is deliberately controversial, in order to generate additional free publicity for the airline. This has led to a number of complaints to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) and occasionally court action being taken against the airline.

Another Ryanair tactic is to make deliberately controversial statements to gain media attention. An example of this was the live BBC News interview on 27 February 2009 when Michael O’Leary, observing that it was “a quiet news day”, commented that Ryanair was considering charging passengers £1 ($1.40) to use the toilet on their flights. The story subsequently made headlines in the media for several days and drew attention to Ryanair’s announcement that it was removing check-in desks from airports and replacing them with online check-in. Eight days later O’Leary eventually admitted that it was a publicity stunt saying “It is not likely to happen, but it makes for interesting and very cheap PR”.

Ryanair often use their advertising to make direct comparisons and attack their competitors. One of their advertisements used a picture of the Manneken Pis, a famous Belgian statue of a urinating urchin, with the words: “Pissed off with Sabena’s high fares? Low fares have arrived in Belgium.” Sabena sued and the court ruled that the advertisements were misleading and offensive. Ryanair was ordered to discontinue the advertisements immediately or face fines. Ryanair was also obliged to publish an apology and publish the court decision on their website. Ryanair used the apologies for further advertising, primarily for further price comparisons.

Another deliberately provocative ad campaign headlined “Expensive Bastards!” compared Ryanair with British Airways. As with Sabena, British Airways disagreed with the accompanying price comparisons and brought legal action against Ryanair. However, in this case the High Court sided with Ryanair and threw BA’s case out ordering BA to make a payment towards Ryanair’s court costs. The judge ruled “The complaint amounts to this: that Ryanair exaggerated in suggesting BA is five times more expensive because BA is only three times more expensive. Accordingly, in my view, the use was honest comparative advertising. I suspect the real reason that BA do not like it is precisely because it is true.”

Inuenndo often features in Ryanair advertisements with one ad featuring a model dressed as a schoolgirl, accompanied by the words “Hottest back to school fares”. Ryanair ran the advertisement in two Scottish and one UK-wide newspaper. After receiving 13 complaints, the advertisement was widely reported by national newspapers, generating more free publicity for the airline. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) instructed them to withdraw the advert in the United Kingdom, saying that it “appeared to link teenage girls with sexually provocative behaviour and was irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence”. Ryanair said that they would “not be withdrawing this ad” and would “not provide the ASA with any of the undertakings they seek”, on the basis that they found it absurd that “a picture of a fully clothed model is now claimed to cause ’serious or widespread offence’, when many of the UK’s leading daily newspapers regularly run pictures of topless or partially dressed females without causing any serious or widespread offence”.

There does seem to be an element within the developer community who view open source (WordPress in particular) as the devil – perhaps because its putting them out of lucrative (overpriced) work?