<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to successfully spam blogs (and how to fight back)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/</link>
	<description>Look what I found today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:11:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-660202</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 10:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocaoimh.ie/2008/02/27/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/#comment-660202</guid>
		<description>So since this blog is running those fancy plugins my current attempt to spam you won&#039;t work? Oh well, on to my next victim.

I&#039;m kidding. But my opinion is that people who have read a blog, thought about it, then left a meaningful well thought out reply should be able to get a little love from Google or whomever. I mean, it all depends on the situation too. If I were moderating all my comments then I&#039;d let everyone get google love except those who were obviously spammers. I happen to not moderate my comments. All comments get through except those Aksimet catches. I thought about doing something similar to what&#039;s described in this post but decided against it because I get more honest comments than spam. Also, blogging is all about give and take. its a community thing and I feel bad not giving my readers a little bit of a reward. But for those who do what is suggested in this site I would totally understand and wouldn&#039;t hold it against them. both sides have valid points. God, sorry for being so longwinded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So since this blog is running those fancy plugins my current attempt to spam you won&#8217;t work? Oh well, on to my next victim.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m kidding. But my opinion is that people who have read a blog, thought about it, then left a meaningful well thought out reply should be able to get a little love from Google or whomever. I mean, it all depends on the situation too. If I were moderating all my comments then I&#8217;d let everyone get google love except those who were obviously spammers. I happen to not moderate my comments. All comments get through except those Aksimet catches. I thought about doing something similar to what&#8217;s described in this post but decided against it because I get more honest comments than spam. Also, blogging is all about give and take. its a community thing and I feel bad not giving my readers a little bit of a reward. But for those who do what is suggested in this site I would totally understand and wouldn&#8217;t hold it against them. both sides have valid points. God, sorry for being so longwinded</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-654333</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocaoimh.ie/2008/02/27/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/#comment-654333</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree. If the comment is automated, then it should be deleted, but if the comment was posted by hand, and the guy bothered to read the article and leave a contextual comment, I have no problem with it. The only exception to this, is if the linked site is not worth linking to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree. If the comment is automated, then it should be deleted, but if the comment was posted by hand, and the guy bothered to read the article and leave a contextual comment, I have no problem with it. The only exception to this, is if the linked site is not worth linking to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XSS TEST</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-654067</link>
		<dc:creator>XSS TEST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocaoimh.ie/2008/02/27/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/#comment-654067</guid>
		<description>XSS test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XSS test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IMFreakz</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-652572</link>
		<dc:creator>IMFreakz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocaoimh.ie/2008/02/27/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/#comment-652572</guid>
		<description>You image capture, I think will lead newbie spammer to make more spam comments :LOL:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You image capture, I think will lead newbie spammer to make more spam comments :LOL:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spammed By A Master (Of Making Money Online) &#124; More Than Scratch The Surface</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-652509</link>
		<dc:creator>Spammed By A Master (Of Making Money Online) &#124; More Than Scratch The Surface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocaoimh.ie/2008/02/27/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/#comment-652509</guid>
		<description>[...] However there are always borderline spam cases: such as those that leave a good comment, but use keywords in the name field, or those that leave their name but link to commercial (non blog) sites. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However there are always borderline spam cases: such as those that leave a good comment, but use keywords in the name field, or those that leave their name but link to commercial (non blog) sites. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K-IntheHouse</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-591696</link>
		<dc:creator>K-IntheHouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocaoimh.ie/2008/02/27/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/#comment-591696</guid>
		<description>Great stuff man! I am usually vigilant about spammy looking comments and tolerate a little when someone uses keywords for the name as long as their comment adds value to the conversation instead of just saying nice post. I do like your Comment Referrer plugin and will install it tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff man! I am usually vigilant about spammy looking comments and tolerate a little when someone uses keywords for the name as long as their comment adds value to the conversation instead of just saying nice post. I do like your Comment Referrer plugin and will install it tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3 полезных WordPress-плагина для борьбы со SMO-спамом &#187; Свобода слова вебмастерского</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-572770</link>
		<dc:creator>3 полезных WordPress-плагина для борьбы со SMO-спамом &#187; Свобода слова вебмастерского</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocaoimh.ie/2008/02/27/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/#comment-572770</guid>
		<description>[...] просторах англоязычного Инета я обнаружил очень актуальный пост, в котором предлагается 2 хороших плагина для борьбы [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] просторах англоязычного Инета я обнаружил очень актуальный пост, в котором предлагается 2 хороших плагина для борьбы [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: furi</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-570107</link>
		<dc:creator>furi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocaoimh.ie/2008/02/27/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/#comment-570107</guid>
		<description>I always locate these spammers and block whole ip address blocks. 
You can use this free tool: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ip-adress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IP address locator&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always locate these spammers and block whole ip address blocks.<br />
You can use this free tool: <a href="http://www.ip-adress.com" rel="nofollow">IP address locator</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nestor</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-566538</link>
		<dc:creator>Nestor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocaoimh.ie/2008/02/27/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/#comment-566538</guid>
		<description>Is it spam if it&#039;s a man made comment though? I don&#039;t really mind someone having their link in a post as long as you get some actual human interaction out of them.

Lately what I did was remove the links out of a spammer&#039;s bot comments so that my site would rank for his keywords (Not that I was interested in them, but to spite him) Of course the bot interpreted it as an open blog so I received a bunch from the same source immediately after so I had to blacklist it. Still left the url stripped ones though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it spam if it&#8217;s a man made comment though? I don&#8217;t really mind someone having their link in a post as long as you get some actual human interaction out of them.</p>
<p>Lately what I did was remove the links out of a spammer&#8217;s bot comments so that my site would rank for his keywords (Not that I was interested in them, but to spite him) Of course the bot interpreted it as an open blog so I received a bunch from the same source immediately after so I had to blacklist it. Still left the url stripped ones though <img src='http://ocaoimh.ie/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donncha</title>
		<link>http://ocaoimh.ie/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-565577</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocaoimh.ie/2008/02/27/how-to-successfully-spam-blogs-and-how-to-fight-back/#comment-565577</guid>
		<description>Thetruth - sorry you feel that way but this is nothing new to spammers, but many bloggers don&#039;t know about it and let through these spammy comments. Since I posted this I received at least a half-dozen of these comments, one spammer even came from this blog post according to my referrer plugin!

David - Yes. That second part of your comment is spammy, but I let it through after sanitizing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thetruth &#8211; sorry you feel that way but this is nothing new to spammers, but many bloggers don&#8217;t know about it and let through these spammy comments. Since I posted this I received at least a half-dozen of these comments, one spammer even came from this blog post according to my referrer plugin!</p>
<p>David &#8211; Yes. That second part of your comment is spammy, but I let it through after sanitizing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
